Volcano Watch

Pushing the volcano monitoring envelope

Like other volcano observatories, HVO devotes most of its resources to volcano monitoring, using time-tested methods that have been found to deliver data useful for understanding and forecasting volcanic behavior. But the monitoring toolkit is not static; it evolves as new technologies become available and as new monitoring strategies are introduced.

Before a new method is adopted, someone has to imagine it—and imagine that it might be superior to an existing method or provide information that is otherwise unavailable. Many volcano-monitoring tools have been adopted from other disciplines, when a volcanologist recognizes the applicability to volcanology. Two examples are interferometric synthetic aperture radar (INSAR) and Doppler radar. INSAR can detect subtle changes in the earth’s surface over broad areas. Doppler radar—used to detect and track plumes from explosive eruptions—was adopted from the meteorological community. Doppler radar images are frequently seen on television weather forecasts. Both INSAR and Doppler radar evolved from radar developed for military applications.

The idea for a new method may spring from a chance observation. For example, pioneering volcanologist Frank Perret, responding to a volcanic crisis at Vesuvius in 1906, wrote: “At the Eremo Hotel, opposite the Royal Observatory, I thought I could hear in the dead of night a low buzzing sound. On opening the window the buzzing ceased, but with my ear to the pillow it again became distinctly audible. With my teeth in contact to the iron bedstead the noise was unquestionably louder, and there was no doubt in my mind that a contact microphone would have shown the sound to be of subterranean origin, definitely premonitory of threatening danger.”

Whatever the source of the idea, it needs to be tested. The outcome of such a test is of course uncertain—otherwise the test wouldn’t be necessary. Many “good ideas” don’t pan out. Frank Perret constructed and tested his contact microphone, but it has not become part of the modern toolkit. On the other hand, seismographs, which measure lower vibrational frequencies, have become the foundation of the volcano-monitoring toolkit.

Observatories can devote only a small fraction of their resources to testing new ideas—just as a prudent stock portfolio manager will allocate only a small fraction of a portfolio to high-risk but potentially high-return stocks.

HVO currently has several speculative stocks in its portfolio. One is the use of multiple continuously recording gravimeters—instruments that accurately measure the pull of gravity. Gravity measurements can detect subtle density changes caused by magma movement beneath the instrument. Gravimeters are notoriously difficult to operate and, traditionally, each measurement has been made manually. The use of continuously recording instruments is new—and experimental.

The study of lava-tube tremor is also experimental. This study was designed to test the idea that fluid motions in flowing tube-lava would generate vibrations. It was hoped that the amplitude and/or frequency of the vibrations would track the lava flux—that is, the rate at which lava flows through the tube. If this were true, we could monitor the changes in Kīlauea’s output in real time. Data collected from seismometers placed atop lava tubes show that lava tubes do indeed produce continuous vibrations, or tremor. And it appears that the tremor amplitude tracks the lava flux over periods of at least a week. Future experiments will collect data over longer time periods.

A third experiment will deploy a number of thermal infrared web cameras. Infrared light penetrates ash and fume better than visible light, so these cameras should be able to provide continuous images of the lava lake within Halema`uma`u Crater. The visible-light cameras currently in use can only see through the fume at night. In addition to images, these new cameras also provide quantitative temperatures that can be monitored for unusual changes over time.

All of these experiments—and others not described—are promising. But they will find their way into regular use only after testing demonstrates that the information they provide is sufficiently useful to justify the cost of procurement and maintenance in a challenging environment.

Kilauea Activity Update

There were several small breakouts just west of the end of Highway 130 last weekend, and a few small breakouts on the Puhi-o-Kalaikini delta at mid-week. All were short-lived and posed no threat to the nearby Kalapana Gardens subdivision. A series of inflation–deflation cycles, ongoing at Kilauea’s summit for the past several weeks, may result in fluctuations in the size of the ocean entry plume over the coming days and could result in more small breakouts on the coastal flow field.

At Kilauea’s summit, a circulating lava pond deep in the collapse pit within the floor of Halema`uma`u Crater was visible via the Webcam throughout the past week. The lava surface rose and fell slowly to match the series of deflation–inflation cycles. This slow change in lava level was punctuated on several occasions by abrupt increases in the height of the lava surface. These periods of high lava level were short-lived, lasting up to several hours, and ended with a sudden drop of the lava surface back to its previous level. Volcanic gas emissions remain elevated, resulting in high concentrations of sulfur dioxide downwind.

Three earthquakes beneath Hawai`i Island were reported felt during the past week. A magnitude-2.5 earthquake occurred at 3:31 p.m. on Thursday, August 19, 2010, H.s.t., and was located 6 km (4 miles) west of Kilauea summit at a depth of 9 km (6 miles). A magnitude-3.1 earthquake occurred at 3:01 p.m. on Monday, August 23, and was located 15 km (10 miles) west of Pahala at a depth of 8 km (5 miles). A magnitude-2.7 earthquake occurred at 3:26 p.m. on Wednesday, August 25, and was located 16 km (10 miles) west of Kilauea summit at a depth of 11 km (7 miles).

Visit the HVO Web site for detailed Kilauea and Mauna Loa activity updates, recent volcano photos, recent earthquakes, and more; call (808) 967-8862 for a Kilauea summary; email questions to askHVO@usgs.gov.

Volcano Watch is a weekly article and activity update written by scientists at the U.S. Geological Survey’s Hawaiian Volcano Observatory.

Dealing with Hazards is a Risky Business

Volcanic hazards come in many forms. The most common hazards for Hawai‘i include earthquakes, lava flows, and wide-ranging vog. What is the definition of hazard?

Merriam-Webster defines “hazard” as a source of danger. Other definitions from dictionary.com include 1) an unavoidable danger or risk, 2) something causing unavoidable danger, peril, risk, or difficulty. In the last two definitions, the term “risk” is introduced. What is “risk”?

“Risk” is defined by dictionary.com as “exposure to the chance of injury or loss; a hazard or dangerous chance.” In volcanology, risk has been defined as the impact (damage) that an event would have on humans within the area affected. This extends to person(s), property, or anything of economic value.

Risk can be defined as the mathematical product of hazard, vulnerability, value, and likelihood (assuming that these concepts can be expressed in numbers).

Everyone on the Island of Hawai`i should be aware of the fact that there are at least three active volcanoes and that lava flows present a significant hazard. The most persistent hazard is vog. Yet, the most damaging hazard is a large earthquake, such as the 2006 Kiholo Bay earthquake that impacted communities as far away as O`ahu.

Simply defined, “vulnerability” is the percentage of value likely to be lost if a hazardous event occurred. If lava contacts your wooden house, it will burn; the house is 100 percent vulnerable. Many houses survived the 2006 Kiholo Bay earthquake with minor damage thanks to improved building codes; therefore, the vulnerability was a small fraction of the cost of a new home.

“Value” is defined explicitly as the dollar amount of life and (or) property that is lost by a hazardous event. Some things are easily tabulated because we see and use them in everyday life—homes lost, roads buried, electrical poles burnt, TV and Internet cables damaged, etc.— and are components of fixed infrastructure; they are relatively easy to quantify.

We would be remiss in future risk assessment if we ignored the loss of productive capacity or the economic loss due to a hazardous event, where businesses and people are unable to earn money.

For example, what would happen if a flow from Mauna Loa advanced down the flank of the volcano and entered the ocean? It is plausible that no homes would be impacted by such a flow, yet highways would be severed, commerce would be impeded, workers could not get to their jobs because travel would be disrupted. The loss of future earnings is harder to assess and has wide-ranging repercussions.

“Likelihood” is often incorporated into the term “hazard” in the risk equation. It is often expressed in terms of probability. Probability estimation is not an easy task and, for lava flow hazards, is based on lava flow ages. To do the best job, we need to determine the recurrence interval (RI) for all lava flows, and this requires access to all lands impacted by lava.

The RI is the average time between past lava flows. For example, in the 167 years since 1843, Mauna Loa has erupted 33 times; 167 years divided by 33 eruptions is about 5 years between lava flows.

Probability and recurrence interval vary inversely. The shorter the RI, the larger the probability that a lava flow will occur in a given period. In our example, the probability of a Mauna Loa eruption occurring in any one year is about 1/5 or 20 percent. Probability can be a difficult concept for many people to grasp. Geologic hazards are generally considered to be random events; there is an equal chance that it will occur in any given year. Passage of a significant amount of time since the last hazardous event does not necessarily mean that there is a greater chance of another one occurring.

Geologic hazards are a reality of living on the flanks of active volcanoes. It is important to know what those hazards are. Risks can be reduced by being prepared and planning for hazardous events. Furthermore, land use planning is the most effective tool for mitigating lava flow hazards. All in all, living on the flanks of volcanoes can be a risky business.

Kilauea Activity Update

Over the past week, activity on the east rift zone flow field remains focused on the construction of low shields. This activity was located well above the Pulama pali, over the breakout point of the Quarry flow. Weak activity continues along the Quarry flow itself from the top of the pali to the coastal plain. In addition to that lava erupting and flowing through the TEB and Quarry flow tube systems, lava is also erupting from two vents within Pu`u `O`o. These vents are slowly filling Pu`u `O`o’s crater, and the Webcam on Pu`u `O`o has been providing spectacular views both day and night.

At Kilauea’s summit, a circulating lava pond deep in the collapse pit within the floor of Halema`uma`u Crater was visible via the Webcam throughout the past week. The baseline lava level continues to rise slowly and was punctuated a few times by short-lived lava-level increases that brought the lava surface to its highest level yet recorded. Volcanic gas emissions remain elevated, resulting in high concentrations of sulfur dioxide downwind.

No earthquakes beneath Hawai`i Island were reported felt during the past week.

Visit the HVO Web site for detailed Kilauea and Mauna Loa activity updates, recent volcano photos, recent earthquakes, and more; call (808) 967-8862 for a Kilauea summary; email questions to askHVO@usgs.gov.

Volcano Watch is a weekly article and activity update written by scientists at the U.S. Geological Survey’s Hawaiian Volcano Observatory.

NetQuakes Offer Community Partnering in Seismic Monitoring

Wednesday, April 14, 2010, 7:37 a.m., Hawaii Standard Time: “Uh. Oh, oh. Did you feel that? It felt like an earthquake.”

By now, many people are familiar with U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) earthquake reporting utilities. First, there’s the Earthquake Notification Service that sends email to lists of subscribers. Messages are sent according to user profiles specifying regions of interest, earthquake magnitude or size, and even times of day when a user wishes to receive an earthquake email notification.

There are also the USGS “recent earthquakes” Web pages that can be accessed via earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes or, simply, earthquake.gov. These Web pages show earthquake times and locations, as determined by the USGS or its seismic network cooperating partners in different parts of the United States and the world.

To display the effects of significant earthquakes, the USGS has developed a family of earthquake information products related to its ShakeMap software. Within minutes of a significant earthquake, ShakeMap provides maps of strong ground shaking and shaking intensity that are used to help guide earthquake response and recovery. ShakeMaps are also used as input to post-earthquake impact assessments and, even long after the actual event, as tools for earthquake preparation and response planning.

Separate but complementary to ShakeMaps are the Community Internet Intensity Maps, or “Did You Feel It?” maps. Using information collected via a Web questionnaire about earthquake effects, these maps graphically show the distribution of damage and other earthquake effects. After a large earthquake, the volume and density of “Did You Feel It?” information submitted by the general public are great compared to the number of instrumental recordings. “Did You Feel It?” reports are incorporated into ShakeMaps.

While combining “Did You Feel It?” and ShakeMap has proven to be quite effective, the USGS would like to have better instrumental recordings of strong earthquakes with increased numbers of modern instruments. This has resulted in a recently launched project called NetQuakes.

The NetQuakes project uses new and relatively low-cost digital seismographs that report data to the USGS via the Internet. These seismographs have been designed to be installed in private homes, businesses, public buildings and schools where there is an existing broadband Internet connection.

At the heart of the NetQuakes project are people who are willing to host the NetQuakes seismographs, which access the Internet via a wireless router connected to the hosts’ existing broadband Internet connection. The seismographs transmit data only after earthquakes above about magnitude 3 have been recorded and otherwise do not consume any significant bandwidth.

The USGS is focused on getting large numbers of NetQuakes instruments installed in high-hazard urban areas like San Francisco, Los Angeles or Seattle, but the Hawaiian Volcano Observatory (HVO) has received a small number of NetQuakes seismographs to use in Hawai`i. We have found a number of hosts and have begun to install the NetQuakes instruments.

Following the magnitude-3.8 earthquake on Wednesday morning, April 14, our first NetQuakes record was automatically retrieved and posted online. This came from our host in Honomu, where, because of the high mountains, it is challenging and costly for us to retrieve data from instruments using our typical means of data transfer. As we expand the NetQuakes footprint, we expect to record additional data that will help us better understand the distribution of earthquake effects. In Hawai`i, we look forward to being able to deploy a larger number of NetQuakes seismographs.

Wednesday’s earthquake was a lithospheric adjustment to the weight of the island. The USGS received 127 “Did You Feel It?” reports on the earthquake, which was felt across the Island of Hawai`i.

Kilauea activity update

On Kilauea’s east rift zone, breakouts along the east margin of the Thanksgiving Eve Breakout (TEB) flow remain active on the Pulama pali. The active flow front was just a few hundred yards from rejoining the main TEB flow field on the coastal plain on Thursday, April 15. If lava supply to these flows continues, they are expected to migrate south along the east margin of the TEB flow field, near the public viewing area. The flows may also stall before reaching the coast due to ongoing lava supply fluctuations.

At Kilauea’s summit, a ponded, circulating lava surface deep within the collapse pit inset within the floor of Halema`uma`u Crater was visible via Webcam during much of the past week. Volcanic gas emissions remain elevated, resulting in high concentrations of sulfur dioxide downwind.

One earthquake beneath Hawai`i Island was reported felt during the past week. The magnitude-3.8 earthquake occurred at 7:37 a.m., H.s.t., on Wednesday, April 14, 2010, and was located 4 km (2 miles) west of Pahala, at a depth of 38.2 km (23.7 miles),

Visit the HVO Web site for detailed Kilauea and Mauna Loa activity updates, recent volcano photos, recent earthquakes, and more; call (808) 967-8862 for a Kilauea summary; email questions to askHVO@usgs.gov.

Volcano Watch is a weekly article and activity update written by scientists at the U.S. Geological Survey’s Hawaiian Volcano Observatory.

Earth has just a handful of long-lived lava lakes

What volcanic locale do the following characteristics describe? (1) A persistent lava pond within a deep pit crater, just below a popular visitor overlook in a national park, (2) Small explosions that have thrown debris over a nearby visitor parking lot, (3) A continuous gas plume, producing choking vog that affects downwind communities, (4) The sacred home of a fearsome female deity.

To most Volcano Watch readers, these descriptions would rouse thoughts of Halema`uma`u Crater, at Kilauea’s summit. Its ongoing eruption, now entering its third year, exhibits all the characteristics above.

But, remarkably, these traits also describe Masaya volcano, a broad basaltic shield just outside the city of Managua in Nicaragua. It is frequently active, with Spaniards first documenting its activity in 1525. Some Spaniards believed it was the mouth of hell, while others tried to extract the gold they thought was within the active vent. To indigenous people, Masaya was the home of Chalchiutlicue, the water deity, who was an old and wise sorceress with sharp fangs.

In recent decades, a deep pit crater at Masaya has hosted persistent lava activity. At times, there is a lava pond, and, at other times, the floor of the crater consists of rubble with small incandescent openings. Visitors can see the vent from the overlook on the crater rim. In April 2001, a small explosion scattered rocks across the visitor parking lot, just beside the overlook, damaging cars and buses. Tourists at the overlook sought refuge in their vehicles or fled on foot; several sustained injuries from flying debris. Despite the danger, Masaya continues to be a popular visitor destination in Nicaragua.

Persistent lava lakes and lava ponds exist at several other volcanoes. Mount Erebus, on Ross Island in Antarctica, has hosted a small lava lake since at least 1972, and possibly as far back as 1841. Mount Erebus’ lava lake is notable, in part, because of the frequent small explosions in which large gas bubbles can be seen rising to the surface and bursting in spectacular fashion.

Two long-lived lava lakes are situated in Africa. Erta Ale volcano, in a remote part of Ethiopia, has hosted a lava lake since at least 1967. The lava surface consists of slowly migrating crustal plates, with upwelling in one portion of the lake and sinking in another. Mount Nyiragongo, in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, is a large stratovolcano that has hosted a lava lake since at least the 1950s. The lava lake has drained several times through the volcano’s flank, producing fast-moving flows that have entered the city of Goma with deadly results.

How can lava lakes exist for decades? All persistent lava lakes share a fundamental process—called magmatic convection—that enables them to remain fluid. It begins with gas-rich magma rising from depth. As the magma approaches the surface, the gases bubble out and escape. The magma at the top of the column, now degassed and somewhat cooled, is slightly denser and sinks back down the conduit. This cycling of mass and heat sustains an open, active vent—a process now underway at Halema`uma`u.

Persistent lava lakes are invaluable to scientists because they offer a “natural laboratory” for volcanic processes. The continuous activity provides ample time to observe magmatic convection, crustal foundering, degassing, and spattering behaviors. Changes in activity can be observed and used as keys to understanding the deeper magmatic system.

What can we learn about Halema`uma`u from these other lava lakes? Whereas eruptions are relatively brief at most volcanoes on Earth, persistent lava lakes demonstrate that some volcanoes can maintain continuous activity for decades or more. We know that Halema`uma`u’s lava lake persisted through much of the 1800s and early 1900s, so Halema`uma`u is essentially already a part of this exclusive group.

The question is whether Halema`uma`u’s current activity will continue sufficiently long that it can renew its membership in the persistent lava lake club. Only time will tell, and HVO will continue to watch and learn from this fascinating eruption.

Kilauea activity update

On Kilauea’s east rift zone, small breakouts were active well above the pali, about 1 km (0.6 mile) above Royal Gardens subdivision, through the week. There are no active flows on the face of the pali, on the coastal plain, or in the National Park.

At Kilauea’s summit, a spattering and roiling lava surface deep within the collapse pit inset within the floor of Halema`uma`u Crater was occasionally visible via Webcam during the past week. Volcanic gas emissions remain elevated, resulting in high concentrations of sulfur dioxide downwind.

One earthquake beneath Hawai`i Island was reported felt during the past week. A magnitude-2.9 earthquake occurred at 1:11 a.m. on Wednesday, March 24, 2010, H.s.t., and was located 15 km (9 miles) west of Pahala, at a depth of 3 km (2 miles).

Visit the HVO Web site for detailed Kilauea and Mauna Loa activity updates, recent volcano photos, recent earthquakes, and more; call (808) 967-8862 for a Kilauea summary; email questions to askHVO@usgs.gov.

Volcano Watch is a weekly article and activity update written by scientists at the U.S. Geological Survey’s Hawaiian Volcano Observatory.

Volcano Watch

Lava takes ‘two steps forward, one step backward’

Lava advances in “two steps forward, one step backward” style

Long-time Kilauea Volcano watchers know the drill when the supply of magma to the active vent on the volcano’s east rift zone is interrupted—abandonment of the “old” lava tube system, breakout of new surface flows, an evolving tube network, and eventually a new ocean entry.

This drama is unfolding again as many small `a`a and pahoehoe flows spread through what is left of the Royal Gardens subdivision and move a short distance across the coastal plain. The flows are providing sporadic, distant views of incandescent lava, glow, and burning vegetation from the Hawai`i County viewing area in Kalapana.

These flows are the consequence of a temporary decrease in magma supply to the active vent, beginning December 29 and lasting nearly 6 days. The decrease corresponded to a pronounced deflation of the summit and east rift zone area, followed by several days of only slight inflation as recorded by sensitive tiltmeters.

Scientists interpret deflation as an indicator of a relative decrease in magma supply and inflation as an increase in magma supply.

When the December 29 deflation event began, lava was pouring into the ocean at Waikupanaha, and more than 1,000 people per day were visiting the Hawai`i County lava viewing area. Within a few days, however, the entry shut off completely. Lava stopped entering the ocean by January 4, but some lava continued to move through the uppermost part of the tube system within about 3 km (2 miles) of the TEB vent.

The upper tube system lies within a complex series of rootless shields tens of meters (yards) tall that were built by thousands of overlapping small flows between November 2007 and February 2008. Near the lower end of these rootless shields, the original tube system became blocked as the Waikupanaha entry shut off, forcing lava to break out onto the surface at several locations between the shields and the top of Royal Gardens.

These flows are slowly creating a new but unstable tube system as the supply of magma to the vent continues to fluctuate. Seven deflation-inflation events have occurred since December 29.

During the inflation periods, new breakouts from the tube have generally formed longer flows that reached lower and lower elevations on the pali. Breakouts from the next inflation period often start lower than the previous breakout—evidence that the tube system was elongating and forming longer flows. The overall result of this pattern, as described by scientists, is a “two steps forward, one step back”-style of flow advancement and tube development.

Continued small fluctuations in magma supply as a consequence of small deflation-inflation cycles will likely promote growth of the new tube system all the way to the coast, west of the Waikupanaha entry. But a larger- or longer-than-usual deflation event may cause the young tube system to stagnate and trigger new breakouts above Royal Gardens in a sudden step backward.

Kilauea Activity Update

Surface flows have been active on the lower pali and coastal plain within the Royal Gardens subdivision. These flows have largely stayed close to the base of the pali but had extended halfway to the coast by Thursday morning. A deflation/inflation cycle, which started on Tuesday at Kilauea’s summit, caused these flows to slow down by mid-week. Surface flows in the same general area will likely be renewed when the volcano re-inflates.

At Kilauea’s summit, a spattering and roiling lava surface, deep within the collapse pit inset within the floor of Halema`uma`u Crater, was sporadically visible via Webcam. On several occasions, the lava surface rose slightly briefly covering the floor of the pit, but activity, for the most part, has remained fairly steady. Volcanic gas emissions remain elevated, resulting in high concentrations of sulfur dioxide downwind.

There were no felt earthquakes during the past week.

Visit the HVO Website for detailed Kilauea and Mauna Loa activity updates, recent volcano photos, recent earthquakes, and more; call (808) 967-8862 for a Kilauea summary; email questions to askHVO@usgs.gov.

Volcano Watch is a weekly article and activity update written by scientists at the U.S. Geological Survey’s Hawaiian Volcano Observatory.

Photo: Aerial view of Kilauea Volcano’s south flank shows new lava flows in Royal Gardens subdivision (center) and the coastal plain (bottom center). Blue smoke (center right) is from burning vegetation caused by active lava flows. The developing lava-tube system is marked by the linear alignment of fume left of the burning vegetation, extending to the horizon. U.S. Geological Survey photograph by Jim Kauahikaua, February 11, 2010.

Charcoal (lower right), found under a lava flow, provides valuable clues to the past eruptive history of a volcano.

Geologists date charcoal to reveal volcano secrets

Charcoal (lower right), found under a lava flow, provides valuable clues to the past eruptive history of a volcano.

Charcoal (lower right), found under a lava flow, provides valuable clues to the past eruptive history of a volcano.

The key to unlocking the geologic secrets of a volcano’s future is its past. The further back we can peer into the past and delve into Pele’s secrets, the better we can understand eruptive behaviors of Hawai`i’s volcanoes. Examining data from long spans of time paints a clearer picture of a volcano’s eruptive history which, in turn, allows us to better appraise future volcanic activity.

But how can we be sure of a Hawaiian volcano’s eruptive history when written records began only 170 years ago? In terms of geologic time, 170 years is a mere blink of an eye, so we must use unwritten stories—those recorded by volcanoes themselves—to delve deeper into the past.

In 1980, geologists Jack Lockwood and Peter Lipman discovered that dating charcoal collected from beneath lava flows is a viable way to determine the ages of past eruptions. The technique, radiocarbon dating, was also used by archeologists to date cultural sites.

So, what’s unique about charcoal and how is it used to date volcanic events? Charcoal can be created when lava flows incinerate a forest. As lava buries vegetation, some of the plant material is reduced to ashes like those produced in your fireplace. Vegetation that is not completely burned up is preserved in the form of charcoal.

Carbon is commonplace in nature. In the atmosphere, the ratio of radioactive carbon-14 (C-14) to nonradioactive carbon-13 (C-13) and carbon-12 (C-12) is constant. During photosynthesis, a plant assimilates carbon (this particular ratio of C-14, C-13, and C-12) into the basic building blocks for leaves, branches, stem, and roots. As soon as the plant dies, however, the ratio begins to change as C-14 decays to C-13 or C-12.

The rate at which C-14 decays is well known, which enables scientists to use the ratio of radioactive to nonradioactive carbon to determine how much time has passed since the charcoal was created-a radiocarbon age. These ages are reported as years before present where “present” is 1950, the year when hydrogen bomb tests artificially produced C-14 and altered atmospheric carbon ratios.

Radiocarbon dating of charcoal can help determine the ages of lava flows up to about 50,000 years ago, which is the upper limit of this technique. Even with this limit, 50,000 years of eruptive history provides a much better indication of a volcano’s future behavior than 170 years of written records. The ages of older lava flows, like those on Kohala and most of Mauna Kea, must be determined using methods other than radiocarbon dating.

Collecting charcoal requires skill—and some luck—so we would like to solicit the help of Hawai`i island residents. We ask that you watch for charcoal, usually in the form of a dark black, sooty layer beneath lava flows, anytime you dig a septic system, excavate for cesspool, or grade a foundation.

If you find charcoal, the first thing to do is call HVO (808-967-7328) and let us collect a sample. If that’s not possible, you can collect it yourself. For the charcoal to be useful in revealing a volcano’s past, we need the following additional information with each sample.

We must know where you found the charcoal as accurately as possible. Note the location with GPS, mark it on a map, or include an address. In addition, take a photo or make a sketch of the charcoal in place, including the overlying lava flow. Put the charcoal in a sealed plastic bag, and collect a fist-sized piece of the overlying rock. Finally, call HVO for mailing or drop-off instructions or to arrange for pick-up.

The more we know about your charcoal sample, the more valuable it is and the greater help it provides. Proper documentation is the only difference between a valuable radiocarbon age and hibachi fuel.

By sleuthing out the eruptive history of Hawai`i’s active volcanoes, HVO can better understand and forecast future volcanic activity. Lend us hand by looking for charcoal to date our volcanoes.

Kilauea Activity Update

The breakout within the Royal Gardens subdivision remained active as of Thursday, June 11, but had diminished greatly compared to the previous week. A small breakout on the coastal plain active late last week was stagnant by early this week. No other active surface flows have been reported. The Waikupanaha and Kupapa`u ocean entries continue to produce prominent plumes as lava spills into the ocean.

At Kilauea’s summit, the vent within Halema`uma`u Crater continues to emit elevated amounts of volcanic gas, resulting in high concentrations of sulfur dioxide downwind. Bright glow from the vent was visible at night through the past week. Visits to the vent by HVO geologists have verified that lava remains at a fairly constant level about 100 meters (yards) below the floor of Halema`uma`u crater.

One earthquake beneath Hawai`i Island was reported felt this past week. A magnitude-2.2 earthquake occurred at 4:14 p.m., H.s.t, on Sunday, June 7, 2009, and was located 13 km (8 miles) west of Kawaihae at a depth of 10 km (6 miles).

Visit the HVO Web site for detailed Kilauea and Mauna Loa activity updates, recent volcano photos, recent earthquakes, and more; call (808) 967-8862 for a Kilauea activity summary; email questions to askHVO@usgs.gov. Volcano Watch is a weekly article and activity update written by scientists at the U.S. Geological Survey’s Hawaiian Volcano Observatory.

Webcam Image

Webcam revamp makes lava views safely available

Webcam Image

Lava in Kîlauea’s summit vent creates a nighttime glow that can be safely observed from the Jaggar Museum overlook in Hawai‘i Volcanoes National Park or on the HVO Webcam. Inset image shows the lava surface, which was moving from top center to lower left at the time it was taken.

The Hawaiian Volcano Observatory website was recently revamped to make access to our increasing number of Webcams easier for viewers and the HVO staff who post Webcam images. All HVO Webcams are now linked through a single menu.

The menu lists our five Webcams showing Moku`aweoweo, Mauna Loa summit caldera, the TEB vent and lava tube system on Kilauea’s east rift zone, Pu`u `O`o crater, and two views of the Halema`uma`u vent – one from HVO and another from the rim of Halema`uma`u crater immediately above the new vent.

Webcams allow us to make critical measurements with relatively little risk. The Webcams can work in rain, wind, very high concentrations of sulfur dioxide, and even moderate amounts of ash blasted from the vent. They can be in areas where access is restricted for safety reasons. Webcams can be where people should not.

Two of our Webcams have shown active lava in recent days. On Tuesday night, the TEB Webcam caught active flows near the top of the abandoned Royal Gardens subdivision. As an added treat, the Webcam also caught lights from a cruise ship passing the Kalapana shoreline in the late evening getting good views of the active flows and the Waikupanaha ocean entry.

The Webcams that chronicle developments below the floor of Halema`uma`u Crater have recorded lots of glow since early May. In fact, the recent glow has been the brightest since October 2008. The brightness of the glow is due to molten lava circulating in a narrow conduit about 100 m below the crater floor and about 180 m below the crater rim.

The Webcam located on the rim of Halema`uma`u was recently repositioned to look directly into the vent for views of the circulating lava when clear enough. The wispiness of the gas plume and the relative shallowness of the molten lava have allowed some good views recently. The vent is masked by sunlit fume during the day and is overexposed at night so the best times to look at Webcam views of lava are at dusk and dawn.

The unwavering Webcam views will allow us to better monitor the rise and fall of the lava within the vent. HVO geologists have also recorded video of the lava surface that shows some fascinating movements. The lava emerges from the right side of the Webcam view and flows left across the opening. The flowing lava surface looks chaotic with lots of splashing and bursting bubbles —activity that produces the tephra that is carried aloft by the hot, rising gas and deposited on the rim.

Two recent Volcano Watches have discussed reasons for lava circulation using a lava lamp analogy. Magma must be convecting with the conduit, like the “goo” in a lava lamp, bringing hot, bubble-rich lava to the surface while allowing cooler, bubble-poor lava to sink.

Looking at lava within the Halema`uma`u vent conduit is like watching a lava lamp from above through a hole in the top, all the goo colored orange, and blobs being gas bubbles that burst when they get to the top.

Views from the Halema`uma`u Webcam should allow us to test our ideas about what precedes brown plumes and explosive eruptions. Do rocks fall from vent walls into the molten circulating lava trigger a vigorous gas release which could carry even more spatter and rock dust out of the vent. Or are the brown plumes and more energetic explosive eruptions initiated by a big slug of gas coming up the conduit.

For safety reasons, Hawai`i Volcanoes National Park restricts access to the entire caldera including Crater Rim Drive from Jaggar Museum south to the Chain of Craters Road intersection. Thanks to the HVO Webcams, we can all see what’s happening from much safer vantage points.

Kilauea Activity Update

A deflation/inflation (DI) event at the summit of Kilauea last weekend disrupted the supply of lava through the tube system and caused the Waikupanaha and Kupapa`u ocean entries to shut down. Both entries had resumed by mid-week, accompanied by breakouts near the top of Royal Gardens subdivision and just inland from Kupapa`u.

At Kilauea’s summit, the vent within Halema`uma`u Crater continues to emit elevated amounts of sulfur dioxide gas, resulting in high concentrations of sulfur dioxide downwind. Vigorously upwelling lava within the vent below the crater floor produced bright glow at night, loud gas-rushing noises, and the emission of juvenile ash during the past week.

One earthquake beneath Hawai`i Island was reported felt this past week. A magnitude-3.4 earthquake occurred at 3:55 p.m., H.s.t, on Saturday, May 30, 2009, and was located 9 km (6 miles) southwest of Kilauea Summit at a depth of 26 km (16 miles).

Visit the HVO website for detailed Kilauea and Mauna Loa activity updates, recent volcano photos, recent earthquakes, and more; call (808) 967-8862 for a Kilauea activity summary; email questions to askHVO@usgs.gov. Volcano Watch is a weekly article and activity update written by scientists at the U.S. Geological Survey’s Hawaiian Volcano Observatory.